Geʽez (/ˈɡiːɛz/;[5][6] ግዕዝ, Gəʽəz IPA: [ˈɡɨʕɨz] (listen), and sometimes referred to in scholarly literature as Classical Ethiopic) is an ancient Ethiopian Semitic language. The language originates from what is now northern Ethiopia and Eritrea.
![]() | This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2022) |
Geʽez | |
---|---|
ግዕዝ Gəʽəz | |
![]() | |
Pronunciation | [ˈɡɨʕɨz] |
Native to | Ethiopia, Eritrea |
Extinct | before 10th century to 14th century[1][2] Remains in use as a liturgical language.[3] |
Language family | Afro-Asiatic
|
Writing system | Geʽez script |
Official status | |
Official language in | Liturgical language of the Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church, Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, Eritrean Catholic Church,[3] Ethiopian Catholic Church, and Beta Israel[4] |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-2 | gez |
ISO 639-3 | gez |
Glottolog | geez1241 |
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. |
Today, Geʽez is used as the main liturgical language of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church and Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church, the Ethiopian Catholic Church and Eritrean Catholic Church, and the Beta Israel Jewish community.
The closest living languages to Geʽez are Tigre and Tigrinya, with lexical similarity at 71% and 68%, respectively.[7] Most linguists believe that Geʽez does not constitute a common ancestor of modern Ethio-Semitic languages but became a separate language early on from another hypothetical unattested common language.[8][9][10]
In the transcription employed by the Encyclopaedia Aethiopica, which is widely employed in academia, the contrast here represented as a/ā is represented ä/a.
Geʽez is transliterated according to the following system (see Phoneme table below for IPA):
translit. | h | l | ḥ | m | ś | r | s | q | b | t | ḫ | n | ʼ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Geʽez | ሀ | ለ | ሐ | መ | ሠ | ረ | ሰ | ቀ | በ | ተ | ኀ | ነ | አ |
translit. | k | w | ʽ | z | y | d | g | ṭ | p̣ | ṣ | ḍ | f | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Geʽez | ከ | ወ | ዐ | ዘ | የ | ደ | ገ | ጠ | ጰ | ጸ | ፀ | ፈ | ፐ |
Because Geʽez is no longer spoken in daily life by large communities, the early pronunciation of some consonants is not completely certain. Gragg (1997:244) writes "The consonants corresponding to the graphemes ś (Geʽez ሠ) and ḍ (Geʽez ፀ) have merged with ሰ and ጸ respectively in the phonological system represented by the traditional pronunciation—and indeed in all modern Ethiopian Semitic. ... There is, however, no evidence either in the tradition or in Ethiopian Semitic [for] what value these consonants may have had in Geʽez."
A similar problem is found for the consonant transliterated ḫ. Gragg (1997:245) notes that it corresponds in etymology to velar or uvular fricatives in other Semitic languages, but it was pronounced exactly the same as ḥ in the traditional pronunciation. Though the use of a different letter shows that it must originally have had some other pronunciation, what that pronunciation was is not certain. The chart below lists /ɬ/ and /ɬʼ/ as possible values for ś (ሠ) and ḍ (ፀ) respectively. It also lists /χ/ as a possible value for ḫ (ኀ). These values are tentative, but based on the reconstructed Proto-Semitic consonants that they are descended from.
The following table presents the consonants of the Geʽez language. The reconstructed phonetic value of a phoneme is given in IPA transcription, followed by its representation in the Geʽez script and scholarly transliteration.
Labial | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Pharyngeal | Glottal | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
central | lateral | plain | labialized | |||||||
Nasal | /m/ መ m | /n/ ነ n | ||||||||
Stop/ Affricate |
voiceless | /p/ ፐ p | /t/ ተ t | /k/ ከ k | /kʷ/ ኰ kʷ | /ʔ/ አ ʼ | ||||
voiced | /b/ በ b | /d/ ደ d | /g/ ገ g | /gʷ/ ጐ gʷ | ||||||
emphatic[lower-alpha 1] | /pʼ/ ጰ p̣ | /t’/ ጠ ṭ | /t͡sʼ/ ጸ ṣ | /t͡ɬʼ/ ፀ ḍ | /k’/ ቀ q | /kʷ’/ ቈ qʷ | ||||
Fricative | voiceless | /f/ ፈ f | /s/ ሰ s | /ɬ/ ሠ ś | /x/ ኀ ḫ | /xʷ/ ኈ ḫʷ | /ħ/ ሐ ḥ | /h/ ሀ h | ||
voiced | /z/ ዘ z | /ʕ/ ዐ ʽ | ||||||||
Approximant | /r/ ረ r | /l/ ለ l | /j/ የ y | /w/ ወ w |
Geʽez consonants have a triple opposition between voiceless, voiced, and ejective (or emphatic) obstruents. The Proto-Semitic "emphasis" in Geʽez has been generalized to include emphatic p̣. Geʽez has phonologized labiovelars, descending from Proto-Semitic biphonemes. Geʽez ś ሠ Sawt (in Amharic, also called śe-nigūś, i.e. the se letter used for spelling the word nigūś "king") is reconstructed as descended from a Proto-Semitic voiceless lateral fricative [ɬ]. Like Arabic, Geʽez merged Proto-Semitic š and s in ሰ (also called se-isat: the se letter used for spelling the word isāt "fire"). Apart from this, Geʽez phonology is comparably conservative; the only other Proto-Semitic phonological contrasts lost may be the interdental fricatives and ghayn.
Geʽez distinguishes two genders, masculine and feminine, the latter of which is in certain words marked with the suffix -t. These are less strongly distinguished than in other Semitic languages, in that many nouns not denoting persons can be used in either gender: in translated Christian texts there is a tendency for nouns to follow the gender of the noun with a corresponding meaning in Greek.[12]
There are two numbers, singular and plural. The plural can be constructed either by suffixing -āt to a word, or by internal plural.
Nouns also have two cases: the nominative, which is not marked, and the accusative, which is marked with final -a (e.g. bet, bet-a).
Internal plurals follow certain patterns. Triconsonantal nouns follow one of the following patterns.
Patterns of internal plural for triconsonantal nouns.[1][13] (C=Consonant, V=Vowel) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Pattern | Singular | Meaning | Plural |
ʾaCCāC | ləbs | 'garment' | ʾalbās |
faras | 'horse' | ʾafrās | |
bet | 'house' | ʾabyāt | |
ṣom | 'fast' | ʾaṣwām | |
səm | 'name' | ʾasmāt | |
ʾaCCuC | hagar | 'country' | ʾahgur |
ʾadg | 'ass' | ʾaʾdug | |
ʾaCCəCt | rə's | 'head' | ʾarʾəst |
gabr | 'servant, slave' | ʾagbərt | |
ʾaCāCəC(t) | bagʿ | 'sheep' | ʾabāgəʿ |
gānen | 'devil' | ʾagānənt | |
CVCaC | ʾəzn | 'ear' | ʾəzan |
ʾəgr | 'foot' | ʾəgar | |
CVCaw | ʾəd | 'hand' | ʾədaw |
ʾab | 'father' | ʾabaw | |
ʾəḫʷ | 'brother' | ʾaḫaw |
Quadriconsonantal and some triconsonantal nouns follow the following pattern. Triconsonantal nouns that take this pattern must have at least one long vowel[1]
Patterns of internal plural for quadriconsonantal nouns.[1][13] (C=Consonant, V=Vowel) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Pattern | Singular | Meaning | Plural |
CaCāCəC(t) | dəngəl | 'virgin' | danāgəl |
masfən | 'prince' | masāfənt | |
kokab | 'star' | kawākəbt | |
maskot | 'window' | masākut < masākəwt | |
dorho | 'chicken' | darāwəh | |
lelit | 'night' | layāləy | |
bəḥer | 'earth' | baḥāwərt | |
wəḥiz | 'river' | waḥāyəzt | |
qasis | 'priest' | qasāwəst |
Number | Person | Isolated personal pronoun | Pronominal suffix | |
---|---|---|---|---|
With noun | With verb | |||
Singular | 1. | ʾana | -ya | -ni |
2. masculine | ʾanta | -ka | ||
2. feminine | ʾanti | -ki | ||
3. masculine | wəʾətu | -(h)u | ||
3. feminine | yəʾəti | -(h)a | ||
Plural | 1. | nəḥna | -na | |
2. masculine | ʾantəmu | -kəmu | ||
2. feminine | ʾantən | -kən | ||
3. masculine | wəʾətomu / əmuntu | -(h)omu | ||
3. feminine | wəʾəton / əmāntu | -(h)on |
Person | Perfect qatal-nn |
Imperfect | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Indicative -qattəl |
Jussive -qtəl | |||
Singular | 1. | qatal-ku | ʾə-qattəl | ʾə-qtəl |
2. m. | qatal-ka | tə-qattəl | tə-qtəl | |
2. f. | qatal-ki | tə-qattəl-i | tə-qtəl-i | |
3. m. | qatal-a | yə-qattəl | yə-qtəl | |
3. f. | qatal-at | tə-qattəl | tə-qtəl | |
Plural | 1. | qatal-na | nə-qattəl | nə-qtəl |
2. m. | qatal-kəmmu | tə-qattəl-u | tə-qtəl-u | |
2. f. | qatal-kən | tə-qattəl-ā | tə-qtəl-ā | |
3. m. | qatal-u | yə-qattəl-u | yə-qtəl-u | |
3. f. | qatal-ā | yə-qattəl-ā | yə-qtəl-ā |
Noun phrases have the following overall order:
ba-zā
in-this:F
hagar
city
ba-zā hagar
in-this:F city
in this city
nəguś
king
kəbur
glorious
nəguś kəbur
king glorious
the glorious king
Adjectives and determiners agree with the noun in gender and number:
zāti
this:FEM
nəgəśt
queen
kəbərt
glorious:FEM
zāti nəgəśt kəbərt
this:FEM queen glorious:FEM
this glorious queen
ʼəllu
these:M.PL
nagaśt
kings
kəburān
glorious:PL
ʼəllu nagaśt kəburān
these:M.PL kings glorious:PL
these glorious kings
Relative clauses are introduced by a pronoun which agrees in gender and number with the preceding noun:
bə'si
man
za=qatal-əww-o
which:MASC=kill-3.M.PL-3.M.SG
la=wald-u
to=son=3.M.SG
bə'si za=qatal-əww-o la=wald-u
man which:MASC=kill-3.M.PL-3.M.SG to=son=3.M.SG
the man whose son they killed
As in many Semitic languages, possession by a noun phrase is shown through the construct state. In Geʽez, this is formed by suffixing /-a/ to the possessed noun, which is followed by the possessor, as in the following examples (Lambdin 1978:23):
wald-a
son-construct
nəguś
king
wald-a nəguś
son-construct king
the son of the king
səm-a
name-construct
malʼak
angel
səm-a malʼak
name-construct angel
the name of the angel
Possession by a pronoun is indicated by a suffix on the possessed noun, as seen in the following table:
singular | plural | ||
---|---|---|---|
1st person | -əya | -əna | |
2nd person | masc | -əka | -əkəmu |
fem | -əki | -əkən | |
3rd person | masc | -u | -omu |
fem | -ā | -on |
The following examples show a few nouns with pronominal possessors:
səm-əya name-1SG səm-əya name-1SG my name |
səm-u name-3SG səm-u name-3SG his name |
Another common way of indicating possession by a noun phrase combines the pronominal suffix on a noun with the possessor preceded by the preposition /la=/ 'to, for' (Lambdin 1978:44):
səm-u
name-3SG
la=neguś
to=king
səm-u la=neguś
name-3SG to=king
'the king's name; the name of the king'
Lambdin (1978:45) notes that in comparison to the construct state, this kind of possession is only possible when the possessor is definite and specific. Lambdin also notes that the construct state is the unmarked form of possession in Geʽez.
Geʽez is a prepositional language, as in the following example (Lambdin 1978:16):
wəsta
to
hagar
city
wəsta hagar
to city
to the city
There are three special prepositions, /ba=/ 'in, with', /la=/ 'to, for', /ʼəm=/ 'from', which always appear as clitics, as in the following examples:
ʼəm=hagar
from=city
ʼəm=hagar
from=city
from the city
ba=hagar
in=city
ba=hagar
in=city
in the city
əm=diba
from=on
əm=diba
from=on
down from
ba=zə
in=this
bet
house
ba=zə bet
in=this house
in this house
These proclitic prepositions in Geʽez are similar to the inseparable prepositions in Hebrew.
The normal word order for declarative sentences is VSO. Objects of verbs show accusative case marked with the suffix /-a/:
Takal-a
plant-3.M.SG
bə'si
man
ʿəḍ-a
tree-ACC
Takal-a bə'si ʿəḍ-a
plant-3.M.SG man tree-ACC
The man planted a tree
Questions with a wh-word ('who', 'what', etc.) show the question word at the beginning of the sentence:
ʼAyya
which
hagar
city
ḥanaṣ-u
flee-3PL
ʼAyya hagar ḥanaṣ-u
which city flee-3PL
Which city did they flee?
The common way of negation is the prefix ʾi- which descends from ʾey- (which is attested in Axum inscriptions) from ʾay from Proto-Semitic *ʾal by palatalization.[1] It is prefixed to verbs as follows:
nəḥna
we
ʾi-nəkl
(we) cannot
ḥawira
go
nəḥna ʾi-nəkl ḥawira
we {(we) cannot} go
we cannot go
Geʽez is written with Ethiopic or the Geʽez abugida, a script that was originally developed specifically for this language. In languages that use it, such as Amharic and Tigrinya, the script is called Fidäl, which means script or alphabet.
Geʽez is read from left to right.
The Geʽez script has been adapted to write other languages, usually ones that are also Semitic. The most widespread use is for Amharic in Ethiopia and Tigrinya in Eritrea and Ethiopia. It is also used for Sebatbeit, Meʼen, Agew, and most other languages of Ethiopia. In Eritrea it is used for Tigre, and it is often used for Bilen, a Cushitic language. Some other languages in the Horn of Africa, such as Oromo, used to be written using Geʽez but have switched to Latin-based alphabets. It also uses four series of consonant signs for labialized velar consonants, which are variants of the non-labialized velar consonants:
Basic sign | q(a) | ḫ(a) | k(a) | g(a) |
---|---|---|---|---|
ቀ | ኀ | ከ | ገ | |
Labialized variant | qʷ(a) | ḫʷ(a) | kʷ(a) | gʷ(a) |
ቈ | ኈ | ኰ | ጐ |
Although it is often said that Geʽez literature is dominated by the Bible including the Deuterocanonical books, in fact there are many medieval and early modern original texts in the language. Most of its important works are also the literature of the Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church and Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, which include Christian liturgy (service books, prayers, hymns), hagiographies, and Patristic literature. For instance, around 200 texts were written about indigenous Ethiopian saints from the fourteenth through the nineteenth century. This religious orientation of Geʽez literature was a result of traditional education being the responsibility of priests and monks. "The Church thus constituted the custodian of the nation's culture", notes Richard Pankhurst, and describes the traditional education as follows:
Traditional education was largely biblical. It began with the learning of the alphabet, or more properly, syllabary... The student's second grade comprised the memorization of the first chapter of the first Epistle General of St. John in Geez. The study of writing would probably also begin at this time, and particularly in more modern times some arithmetic might be added. In the third stage the Acts of the Apostles were studied, while certain prayers were also learnt, and writing and arithmetic continued. ... The fourth stage began with the study of the Psalms of David and was considered an important landmark in a child's education, being celebrated by the parents with a feast to which the teacher, father confessor, relatives and neighbours were invited. A boy who had reached this stage would moreover usually be able to write, and might act as a letter writer.[14]
However, works of history and chronography, ecclesiastical and civil law, philology, medicine, and letters were also written in Geʽez.[15]
Significant collections of Ethiopian manuscripts are found outside of Ethiopia in France, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The collection in the British Library comprises some 800 manuscripts dating from the 15th to the 20th centuries, notably including magical and divinatory scrolls, and illuminated manuscripts of the 16th to 17th centuries. It was initiated by a donation of 74 codices by the Church of England Missionary Society in the 1830s and 1840s, and substantially expanded by 349 codices, looted by the British from the Emperor Tewodros II's capital at Magdala in the 1868 Expedition to Abyssinia. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City has at least two illuminated manuscripts in Geʽez.
The Geʽez language is classified as a South Semitic language, though an alternate hypothesis posits that the Semitic languages of Eritrea and Ethiopia may best be considered an independent branch of Semitic.[16] It evolved from an earlier proto-Ge'ez ancestor used to write royal inscriptions of the kingdom of Dʿmt in the Epigraphic South Arabian script. As previously assumed, the Geʽez language is not regarded as an offshoot of Sabaean or Old South Arabian by some scholars,[17] and there is some linguistic (though not written) evidence of Semitic languages being spoken in Eritrea since approximately 2000 BC.[18] However, the Geʽez script later replaced Epigraphic South Arabian in the Kingdom of Aksum. Epigraphic South Arabian letters were used for a few inscriptions into the 8th century BCE, though not any South Arabian language since Dʿmt. Early inscriptions in Geʽez and Geʽez script have been dated[19] to as early as the 5th century BC, and in a sort of proto-Geʽez written in eastern South Arabia since the 9th century BC. Geʽez literature properly begins with the Christianization of Eritrea and Ethiopia (and the civilization of Axum) in the 4th century, during the reign of Ezana of Axum.[15]
The oldest known example of the old Geʽez script is found on the Hawulti obelisk in Matara, Eritrea.[20] The oldest surviving Geʽez manuscript is thought to be the 5th or 6th century Garima Gospels.[21][22] Almost all texts from this early "Aksumite" period are religious (Christian) in nature, and translated from Greek. Indeed, the range and scope of the translation enterprise undertaken in the first century of the new Axumite church has few parallels in the early centuries of Christian history. The outcome was an Ethiopic Bible containing 81 Books: 46 of the Old Testament and 35 of the New. A number of these Books are called "deuterocanonical" (or "apocryphal" according to certain Western theologians), such as the Ascension of Isaiah, Jubilees, Enoch, the Paralipomena of Baruch, Noah, Ezra, Nehemiah, Maccabees, and Tobit. The Book of Enoch in particular is notable since its complete text has survived in no other language; and, for the other works listed, the Ethiopic version is highly regarded as a witness to the original text.
Also to this early period dates Qerlos, a collection of Christological writings beginning with the treatise of Saint Cyril (known as Hamanot Reteʼet or De Recta Fide). These works are the theological foundation of the Ethiopic Church. In the later 5th century, the Aksumite Collection—an extensive selection of liturgical, theological, synodical and historical materials—was translated into Geʽez from Greek, providing a fundamental set of instructions and laws for the developing Axumite Church. Included in this collection is a translation of the Apostolic Tradition (attributed to Hippolytus of Rome, and lost in the original Greek) for which the Ethiopic version provides much the best surviving witness. Another important religious document is Serʼata Paknemis, a translation of the monastic Rules of Pachomius. Non-religious works translated in this period include Physiologus, a work of natural history also very popular in Europe.[23]
After the decline of the Aksumites, a lengthy gap follows; Some writers consider the period beginning from the 14th century an actual "Golden Age" of Geʽez literature—although by this time Geʽez was no longer a living language; in particular in the major enterprise of translating an extensive library of Coptic Arabic religious works into Ge'ez.
While there is ample evidence that it had been replaced by Amharic in the south and by Tigrinya and Tigre in the north, Geʽez remained in use as the official written language until the 19th century, its status comparable to that of Medieval Latin in Europe.
Important hagiographies from this period include:
Also at this time the Apostolic Constitutions was retranslated into Geʽez from Arabic. Another translation from this period is Zena ʼAyhud, a translation (probably from an Arabic translation) of Joseph ben Gurion's "History of the Jews" ("Sefer Josippon") written in Hebrew in the 10th century, which covers the period from the Captivity to the capture of Jerusalem by Titus. Apart from theological works, the earliest contemporary Royal Chronicles of Ethiopia are date to the reign of Amda Seyon I (1314–44). With the appearance of the "Victory Songs" of Amda Seyon, this period also marks the beginning of Amharic literature. The 14th century Kebra Nagast or "Glory of the Kings" by the Neburaʼed Yeshaq of Aksum is among the most significant works of Ethiopian literature, combining history, allegory and symbolism in a retelling of the story of the Queen of Sheba (i.e., Saba), King Solomon, and their son Menelik I of Ethiopia. Another work that began to take shape in this period is the Mashafa Aksum or "Book of Axum".[24]
The early 15th century Fekkare Iyasus "The Explication of Jesus" contains a prophecy of a king called Tewodros, which rose to importance in 19th century Ethiopia as Tewodros II chose this throne name.
Literature flourished especially during the reign of Emperor Zara Yaqob. Written by the Emperor himself were Matsʼhafe Berhan ("The Book of Light") and Matshafe Milad ("The Book of Nativity"). Numerous homilies were written in this period, notably Retuʼa Haimanot ("True Orthodoxy") ascribed to John Chrysostom. Also of monumental importance was the appearance of the Geʽez translation of the Fetha Negest ("Laws of the Kings"), thought to have been around 1450, and ascribed to one Petros Abda Sayd — that was later to function as the supreme Law for Ethiopia, until it was replaced by a modern Constitution in 1931.
By the beginning of the 16th century, the Islamic invasions put an end to the flourishing of Ethiopian literature. A letter of Abba ʼEnbaqom (or "Habakkuk") to Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Ghazi, entitled Anqasa Amin ("Gate of the Faith"), giving his reasons for abandoning Islam, although probably first written in Arabic and later rewritten in an expanded Geʽez version around 1532, is considered one of the classics of later Geʽez literature.[25] During this period, Ethiopian writers begin to address differences between the Ethiopian and the Roman Catholic Church in such works as the Confession of Emperor Gelawdewos, Sawana Nafs ("Refuge of the Soul"), Fekkare Malakot ("Exposition of the Godhead") and Haymanote Abaw ("Faith of the Fathers"). Around the year 1600, a number of works were translated from Arabic into Geʽez for the first time, including the Chronicle of John of Nikiu and the Universal History of George Elmacin.
Geʽez is the liturgical language of Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo, Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo, Ethiopian Catholic and Eritrean Catholic Christians and the Beta Israel (Falasha Jews), and is used in prayer and in scheduled public celebrations.
The liturgical rite used by the Christian churches is referred to as the Ethiopic Rite[26][27][28] or the Geʽez Rite.[29][30][31][32]
The first sentence of the Book of Enoch:
Languages of Ethiopia | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Official language | |||||||||
Regional languages |
| ||||||||
Immigrant languages | |||||||||
Sign languages |
Types of writing systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Writing systems | |
---|---|
Index of language articles | |
Overview |
|
Lists |
|
Types |
|
Current examples | |
Related topics |
|
National libraries | |
---|---|
Other |
|